GLOBAL-LOCAL INTERACTIONS FOR REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE: A CASE STUDY OF DONGGUAN ECO-PARK
YANG Jiang-min1,2, HUANG Geng-zhi2, XUE De-sheng2
1. School of Geography and Tourism, Jiaying University, Meizhou 514011, China; 2. School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China
Abstract：Regional environmental governance is an important research topic in the era of globalization. However, existing studies have mainly focused on the impact of local forces on regional environmental governance, paying less attention to global and local interactions. In addition, research on the role of transnational corporations is insufficient. Taking Dongguan Eco-park as a case study, this paper analyzes the global-local interactive process and mechanism of regional environmental governance from the perspective of actor network. The findings are as follows: 1) Dongguan Eco-park has gone through two different stages: Environmental renovation and environmental optimization. It has been transformed from a highly polluted remote area into an ecological urban area through inter-urban governance within a city. 2) The environmental problems and governance of Dongguan Eco-park are the results of global-local interactions. 3) Local governments and transnational enterprises play a central role in regional environmental governance. The city government led environmental renovation through administrative authority, and transnational enterprises led and supported local enterprises in environmental renovation through market power. These two actors are connected with local enterprises, which promoted the interaction of global-local elements in this region, such as capital, standards, ideas, and technology.
杨江敏, 黄耿志, 薛德升. 区域环境治理的全球—地方互动机制研究——以东莞生态园为例[J]. 人文地理, 2024, 39(6): 123-131.
YANG Jiang-min, HUANG Geng-zhi, XUE De-sheng. GLOBAL-LOCAL INTERACTIONS FOR REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE: A CASE STUDY OF DONGGUAN ECO-PARK. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2024, 39(6): 123-131.
Debarbieux B. How regional is regional environmental governance? [J]. Global Environmental Politics, 2012, 12(3):119-126.
[2]
Haas P M. Regional environmental governance[M] //Borzel T A, Risse T. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016:430-456.
[3]
毛熙彦, 贺灿飞.区域发展的“全球—地方”互动机制研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(10):1449-1461. [Mao Xiyan, He Canfei. A review of global-local interactions for regional development[J]. Progress in Geography, 2019, 38(10):1449-1461.]
[4]
Miller M A. B/ordering the environmental commons[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2021, 45(3):473-491.
[5]
Perz S, Rioja B G, Foster Br I, et al. The contributions of transboundary networks to environmental governance: The legacy of the MAP initiative[J]. Geoforum, 2022, 128:78-91.
[6]
Suhardiman D, Middleton C. The Salween River as a transboundary commons: Fragmented collective action, hybrid governance and power[J]. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 2020, 61(2):301-314.
[7]
Dąbrowski M. Boundary spanning for governance of climate change adaptation in cities: Insights from a Dutch urban region[J]. Environment and Planning C, 2018, 36(5):837-855.
[8]
Sun B, Baker M. Multilevel governance framework for low-carbon development in urban China: A case study of Hongqiao Business District, Shanghai[J]. Cities, 2021, 119:103405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103405.
[9]
母睿, 贾俊婷, 李鹏. 城市群环境合作效果的影响因素研究——基于13个案例的模糊集定性比较分析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2019, 29(8):12-19. [Mu Rui, Jia Junting, Li Peng. Research on the influencing factors of environmental cooperation effectiveness in urban agglomerations[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2019, 29(8):12-19.]
[10]
Setzer J. How subnational governments are rescaling environmental governance: The case of the Brazilian state of São Paulo[J]. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 2017, 19(5):503-519.
[11]
Yong M L. Transboundary environmental publics and hydropower governance in the Mekong River Basin: A contested politics of place, scale and temporality[J]. Environmental Policy and Governance, 2022, 32(4):292-304.
[12]
Miao B, Li Y V. Local climate governance under the shadow of hierarchy: Evidence from China's Yangtze River Delta[J]. Urban Policy and Research, 2017, 35(3):298-311.
[13]
Pinel S L, Rodriguez F L, Cuenca R M, et al. Scaling down or scaling up? Local actor decisions and the feasibility of decentralized environmental governance: A case of Paramo wetlands in Southern Ecuador[J]. Scottish Geographical Journal, 2018, 134(1/2):45-70.
[14]
Serge Kubanza N, Matsika R, Magha C G. Exploring the role of local authorities and community participation in solid waste management in Sub-Saharan Africa: A study of Alexandra, Johannesburg, South Africa[J]. Local Environment, 2022, 27(2):197-214.
[15]
Sonnenfeld D A, Mol A P J. Globalization and the transformation of environmental governance[J]. American Behavioral Scientist, 2002, 45(9):1318-1339.
[16]
Yang J M, Xue D S, Huang G Z. The changing factors affecting local environmental governance in China: Evidence from a study of prefecture-level cities in Guangdong province[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, 17(10):35-73. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103573.
[17]
Lenschow A, Newig J, Challies E. Globalization's limits to the environmental state? Integrating telecoupling into global environmental governance[J]. Environmental Politics, 2016, 25(1SI):136-159.
[18]
孙燕铭, 周传玉.长三角区域大气污染协同治理的时空演化特征及其影响因素[J]. 地理研究, 2022, 41(10):2742-2759. [Sun Yanming, Zhou Chuanyu. The spatio-temporal evolution characteristics and influencing factors of collaborative governance of air pollution in the Yangtze River Delta region[J]. Geographical Research, 2022, 41(10):2742-2759.]
[19]
Selin H, Vandeveer S D. European Union and Environmental Governance[M]. London: Routledge, 2015:89-117.
[20]
Schiff J S. The evolution of Rhine river governance: Historical lessons for modern transboundary water management[J]. Water History, 2017, 9(3):279-294.
[21]
Norman E S, Bakker K. Do good fences make good neighbours? Canada-United States transboundary water governance, the Boundary Waters Treaty, and twenty-first-century challenges[J]. Water International, 2015, 40(1):199-213.
[22]
Zhang J J, Savage V R. Southeast Asia's transboundary haze pollution: Unravelling the inconvenient truth[J]. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 2019, 60(3):355-369.
[23]
Yong M L, Gillespie J. Towards relational geometries of public participation and hydropower governance in the Lower Mekong River Basin[J]. Political Geography, 2022, 99:102773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102773.
[24]
Gladstone F, Liverman D, Sánchez R R A, et al. NAFTA and environment after 25 years: A retrospective analysis of the US-Mexico border[J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2021, 119:18-33.
[25]
Hochstetler K. After the boomerang: Environmental movements and politics in the La Plata River Basin[J]. Global Environmental Politics, 2002, 2(4):35-57.
[26]
Hensengerth O, Lam T H O, van Pham D T, et al. How to promote sustainability? The challenge of strategic spatial planning in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta[J]. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 2024, 26(1):91-103.
[27]
Gverdtsiteli G. Can donors encourage authoritarian states to go green? Evidence from Vietnamese-German development cooperation[J]. The Journal of Environment & Development, 2023, 33(1):29-49.
[28]
Yang J M, Huang G Z. Study on the mechanism of multi-scalar transboundary water security governance in the Shenzhen River[J]. Sustainability, 2024, 16:7138. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167138.
[29]
Pacheco-Vega R, Murdie A. When do environmental NGOs work? A test of the conditional effectiveness of environmental advocacy [J]. Environmental Politics, 2021, 30(1/2):180-201.
[30]
Mejia S A. Does foreign capital dependence affect carbon dioxide emissions in less-developed countries? A cross-national analysis, 1980-2014[J]. Social Science Quarterly, 2021, 102(4):1982-1993.
[31]
Cole M A, Elliott R J R, Zhang L. Foreign direct investment and the environment[J]. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2017, 42(1):465-487.
[32]
Yu X, Wong K K. Environmental performance of foreign direct investment(FDI) companies in the Pearl River Delta Region(PRDR): A case study of Dongguan city[J]. Australian Geographer, 2011, 42(1):79-93.
[33]
沈静, 王毅斌, 曹媛媛. 从全球到地方：东莞家具产业的绿色化升级路径[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(12):3455-3469. [Shen Jing, Wang Yibin, Cao Yuanyuan. From global to local: Environmental upgrading of the furniture industry in Dongguan[J]. Geographical Research, 2021, 40(12):3455-3469.]
[34]
De Marchi V, Di Maria E, Krishnan A, et al. Environmental upgrading in global value chains[M] //Ponte S, Gereffi G, Raj-Reichert G. Handbook on Global Value Chains, Cheltenha: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019:310-323.
[35]
黄颖敏, 薛德升, 黄耿志.改革开放以来珠江三角洲基层非正规土地利用实践与制度创新——以东莞市长安镇为例[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(12):1831-1840. [Huang Yingmin, Xue Desheng, Huang Gengzhi. The local informal land practice and institutional innovation in the Pearl River Delta since 1978: A case study of Chang'an town in Dongguan city[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2017, 37(12):1831-1840.]
[36]
Xue D S, Wu F L. Failing entrepreneurial governance: From economic crisis to fiscal crisis in the city of Dongguan, China[J]. Cities, 2015, 43:10-17.
[37]
Lin G C S. Peri-urbanism in globalizing China: A study of new urbanism in Dongguan[J]. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 2006, 47(1):28-53.
[38]
Shen J, Wong K, Feng Z Q. State-sponsored and spontaneous urbanization in the Pearl River Delta of South China, 1980-1998[J]. Urban Geography, 2002, 23(7):674-694.
[39]
Yang C. Overseas Chinese investments in transition: The case of Dongguan[J]. Eurasian Geography & Economics, 2006, 47(5):604-621.
[40]
Callon M. Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay[J]. The Sociological Review, 1984, 32(S1):196-233.
[41]
Law J. Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity[J]. Systems Practice, 1992, 5(4):379-393.
[42]
Latour B. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society[M]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987:1-274.
